Terry McAuliffe – Law Street https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com Law and Policy for Our Generation Wed, 13 Nov 2019 21:46:22 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.8 100397344 State of Emergency Declared in Charlottesville https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/politics-blog/state-emergency-declared-charlottesville/ https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/politics-blog/state-emergency-declared-charlottesville/#respond Sat, 12 Aug 2017 23:03:44 +0000 https://lawstreetmedia.com/?p=62706

None of this is ok.

The post State of Emergency Declared in Charlottesville appeared first on Law Street.

]]>
Image courtesy of Rex Hammock; License: (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Last night, white nationalists descended on Charlottesville, Virginia, where the University of Virginia is located. Many carried nazi or confederate flags, along with other symbols of white supremacy. Charlottesville has turned into somewhat of a powder keg after plans to remove a confederate statute from a nearby park sparked protests. Today, a car drove straight into a crowd of Black Lives Matter counter-protesters, killing at least one and injuring others. In response to the violence brought by the protesters, Governor Terry McAuliffe has declared a state of emergency in Virginia.

Scenes from the events last night and today have reverberated on social media, with many calling it out for what it is: blatant white supremacy and domestic terrorism.

Of course, all eyes were on one particular individual’s reaction. President Donald Trump gave a short statement on Saturday afternoon, saying that “we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides, on many sides.” But as many pointed out, there aren’t that many sides to this debate: there are violent white supremacists and then there are peaceful counter-protesters.

To be frank, no one expected Trump to have a particularly strong response. Trump had a track record of refusing to condemn white nationalists or violence at his campaign events. But, as the president of the United States, he needs to be doing better. As scenes continue to unfold in Charlottesville, the blatant white supremacy on display needs to be condemned in the harshest of possible terms.

Anneliese Mahoney
Anneliese Mahoney is Managing Editor at Law Street and a Connecticut transplant to Washington D.C. She has a Bachelor’s degree in International Affairs from the George Washington University, and a passion for law, politics, and social issues. Contact Anneliese at amahoney@LawStreetMedia.com.

The post State of Emergency Declared in Charlottesville appeared first on Law Street.

]]>
https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/politics-blog/state-emergency-declared-charlottesville/feed/ 0 62706
Who is Corey Stewart, the Pro-Confederate Virginia Gubernatorial Candidate? https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/politics-blog/corey-stewart-pro-confederate-virginia-gubernatorial-candidate/ https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/politics-blog/corey-stewart-pro-confederate-virginia-gubernatorial-candidate/#respond Fri, 28 Apr 2017 18:13:52 +0000 https://lawstreetmedia.com/?p=60457

Virginia could be getting its own Donald Trump.

The post Who is Corey Stewart, the Pro-Confederate Virginia Gubernatorial Candidate? appeared first on Law Street.

]]>
Corey Stewart Courtesy of Gage Skidmore License: (CC BY-SA 2.0)

When the city of New Orleans finally began the process of taking down its pro-Confederate monuments this week, it faced some opposition. One of the more high-profile critics of the decision was Virginia’s Republican gubernatorial candidate Corey Stewart.

Stewart attracted attention on the internet a few days ago for his tweet-storm defending preservation of the monuments. But there was one controversial tweet in particular that stood out.

Twitter users quickly reminded Stewart that he is not from the South (he is a Minnesota native), and that a lot of things are actually worse than “a Yankee telling a Southerner that his monuments don’t matter.”

Stewart, who is currently a chairman for the Board of Supervisors in Prince Williams County, Virginia, announced his bid for governor of the state in April 2016 (the primary elections will take place this June). Since then, he has become a vocal advocate for honoring Confederate landmarks, and has integrated the issue heavily into his campaign. In February, he organized protests in Charlottesville, Virginia against the removal of a Robert E. Lee statue. Earlier this month, he attended a Civil War-themed “Old South Ball.”

For many, Confederate symbols (like the flag) will always represent white supremacy because of their ties to the southern states that seceded from the U.S. and defended slavery during the Civil War. Stewart, on the other hand, has said that his position on the issue is not about the Confederate flag, but about “rampant, uncontrolled political correctness that is shaming Virginians who are simply trying to honor their ancestors, their ancestry, their heritage.”

If that anti-political correctness sentiment sounds familiar to you, it’s probably because you’ve heard similar things from President Donald Trump while he was on the campaign trail. Stewart supported Trump during the presidential election and served as the chair of Trump’s campaign in Virginia, until he was fired for orchestrating an unauthorized protest against anti-Trump Republicans outside the Republican National Convention headquarters.

Now, his commitment to protecting Confederate heritage, and combating what he calls “historical vandalism,” could hurt him in his run. Stewart recently lost the support of Prince William County’s sheriff, who switched his endorsement to back Stewart’s Republican opponent Ed Gillespie. Sheriff Glendell Hill told the Washington Post that Stewart’s views on “all that Confederate stuff” were too divisive. Four GOP supervisors who serve on the county board with Stewart also chose to endorse Gillespie.

Like Trump, Stewart is known for being outspoken on the internet. In March, he answered questions on a Reddit thread known as an “Ask Me Anything,” or AMA. At one point in the AMA, Stewart referred to Gillespie as a “cuckservative,” a term coined by the alt-right movement to disparage Republicans who are too moderate. In the same question-and-answer session on the site, he called for deportation of “criminal illegal aliens,” called globalists “BAD people” (even though he has worked as an international trade attorney).

Stewart has also tried to cover up negative information about himself–like low ratings about his claims on the fact-checker Politifact, and his loss in the 2016 race for lieutenant governor–by editing his own Wikipedia page.

From the establishment of sanctuary cities to the legalization of marijuana, a lot of resistance to the Trump Administration and its policies happens on local and state levels. Virginia’s current governor, Democrat Terry McAuliffe, has opposed the president’s immigration order while Democratic candidates for governor like Tom Perriello and Ralph Northam have both criticized and vowed to push back against the federal government. But a win for Stewart could change that.

However, a recent Quinnipiac University poll showed Gillespie–who voted for Trump, but whose support of the president has been lukewarm in comparison to Stewart’s–leading with 28 percent, while Stewart is currently falling behind at 12 percent. According to the same poll, in the general election both Perriello and Northham would hold double-digit leads over Gillespie.

Not to mention, Trump’s politics haven’t been very popular in Virginia–he pulled his campaign out of the state weeks before the election, a move that was criticized by Stewart.

Victoria Sheridan
Victoria is an editorial intern at Law Street. She is a senior journalism major and French minor at George Washington University. She’s also an editor at GW’s student newspaper, The Hatchet. In her free time, she is either traveling or planning her next trip abroad. Contact Victoria at VSheridan@LawStreetMedia.com.

The post Who is Corey Stewart, the Pro-Confederate Virginia Gubernatorial Candidate? appeared first on Law Street.

]]>
https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/politics-blog/corey-stewart-pro-confederate-virginia-gubernatorial-candidate/feed/ 0 60457
Virginia Tourism Starts Marketing to LGBT Travelers https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/culture-blog/virginia-tourism-starts-marketing-specifically-lgbt-travelers/ https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/culture-blog/virginia-tourism-starts-marketing-specifically-lgbt-travelers/#respond Sat, 24 Sep 2016 23:51:12 +0000 http://lawstreetmedia.com/?p=55741

A new campaign states: "Virginia is for all Lovers."

The post Virginia Tourism Starts Marketing to LGBT Travelers appeared first on Law Street.

]]>
Image courtesy of [Ted Eytan via Flickr]

The commonwealth of Virginia recently unveiled a new tourism campaign, specifically aimed at attracting LGBT travelers. Given that some states (looking at you, North Carolina and Mississippi) have been the given travel advisories from other countries warning LGBT travelers, it makes sense that one state is trying to appeal to that niche of the tourism market.

Virginia is playing off its longstanding slogan–“Virginia is for Lovers”–with “Virginia is for all Lovers.”

The new travel site reads:

We hope you’ll use Virginia.org/lgbt to explore our LGBT-friendly lodging, dining, history, shopping, attractions, events and outdoor experiences statewide. Our website also includes meeting spaces, itineraries, and all the resources you need to plan your dream wedding or honeymoon.

Our listings have been self-designated by Virginia business owners and hosts as LGBT-friendly. New listings are being added every day, so please return often to find the most authentic, safe and welcoming Virginia experiences for your family and friends.

The tourism campaign will also include merchandise, and will consistently reevaluate and build on the listings of LGBT-friendly destinations and venues. The new tourism plan is the result of an LGBT tourism task force created by Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe almost two years ago.

McAuliffe stated:

Virginia is proud to be an open and welcoming destination for every visitor attracted by our scenic mountains and beaches, as well as our world-renowned restaurants, wineries and breweries.

I am pleased the Virginia Tourism Corporation has created this landing page to connect travelers with inclusive, LGBT-friendly establishments across the Commonwealth. Virginia is truly for lovers, and we hope you have an unforgettable experience visiting the greatest state in the greatest nation on Earth!

According to the Richmond Times Dispatch, Virginia made $23 million in tourism in 2015, and 5 percent of the visitors identified as LGBT. With the new campaign, Virginia may soon see that number rise.

Anneliese Mahoney
Anneliese Mahoney is Managing Editor at Law Street and a Connecticut transplant to Washington D.C. She has a Bachelor’s degree in International Affairs from the George Washington University, and a passion for law, politics, and social issues. Contact Anneliese at amahoney@LawStreetMedia.com.

The post Virginia Tourism Starts Marketing to LGBT Travelers appeared first on Law Street.

]]>
https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/culture-blog/virginia-tourism-starts-marketing-specifically-lgbt-travelers/feed/ 0 55741
Virginia Governor Doubles Down on Effort to Restore Voting Rights to Felons https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/politics-blog/virginia-governor-doubles-down-on-effort-to-restore-voting-rights-to-felons/ https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/politics-blog/virginia-governor-doubles-down-on-effort-to-restore-voting-rights-to-felons/#respond Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:19:27 +0000 http://lawstreetmedia.com/?p=55054

His new policy will restore the voting rights of 13,000 released felons.

The post Virginia Governor Doubles Down on Effort to Restore Voting Rights to Felons appeared first on Law Street.

]]>
"McAuliffe Courtesy of [Kate Wellington via Flickr]

After begin denied by his state’s Supreme Court in July, Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe on Tuesday reinstated the voting rights of 13,000 released felons. His Restoration of Rights policy, announced in a speech delivered at Capitol Square in Richmond, is based on McAuliffe’s “belief in the power of second chances and his determination that our Commonwealth will no longer treat these individuals like second class citizens,” according to the official policy memo.

Tuesday’s announcement follows a July 23 decision by Virginia’s Supreme Court that struck down McAuliffe’s previous attempt at restoring voting rights to convicted felons. That case was brought to the court by Republican lawmakers who saw his blanket voting restoration efforts as unconstitutional. The court agreed. “The assertion that a Virginia Governor has the power to grant blanket, group pardons is irreconcilable” with Virginia’s constitutional requirement “that the Governor communicate to the General Assembly the ‘particulars of every case’ and state his ‘reasons’ for each pardon,” the 4-3 decision found.

By reviewing each particular case of the 13,000 felons whose voting rights he is reinstating, as he claimed he did, McAuliffe is avoiding the “blanket, group pardons” that the Supreme Court’s July decision reprimanded. “If a person is judged to be safe to live in the community, he or she should have a full voice in its governance,” the memo said, while adding Virginia’s current policy regarding convicted felons’ voting rights as being “rooted in a tragic history of voter suppression and marginalization of minorities, and it needs to be overturned.”

A Washington Post poll found that 61 percent of Virginians agree with restoring voting rights to felons. But they are more divided as to what McAuliffe’s intentions are–45 percent of those polled said that he simply wanted to do the right thing, while 42 percent said he wanted to boost voter turnout for Democrats. Whatever his motivations, it seems that the Governor is proceeding with his plan. The policy lays out two steps toward restoring felons’ voting rights as follows:

Step One: Re-restoring the rights of individuals who had their voter registration canceled as a result of the Virginia Supreme Court’s decision.

Step Two: Restoring the rights of other qualified individuals.

“The Virginia Constitution is clear,” McAuliffe said during his speech in Richmond, “I have the authority to restore civil rights without limitation.”

To read more about McAuliffe’s effort, check out Law Street’s previous coverage of the issue.

Alec Siegel
Alec Siegel is a staff writer at Law Street Media. When he’s not working at Law Street he’s either cooking a mediocre tofu dish or enjoying a run in the woods. His passions include: gooey chocolate chips, black coffee, mountains, the Animal Kingdom in general, and John Lennon. Baklava is his achilles heel. Contact Alec at ASiegel@LawStreetMedia.com.

The post Virginia Governor Doubles Down on Effort to Restore Voting Rights to Felons appeared first on Law Street.

]]>
https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/politics-blog/virginia-governor-doubles-down-on-effort-to-restore-voting-rights-to-felons/feed/ 0 55054
Virginia Governor Wages Fierce Fight for Voting Rights https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/news/virginia-governor-wages-fierce-fight-voting-rights/ https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/news/virginia-governor-wages-fierce-fight-voting-rights/#respond Fri, 29 Jul 2016 17:19:36 +0000 http://lawstreetmedia.com/?p=54514

Terry McAuliffe spearheads the fight for ex-felons' right to vote

The post Virginia Governor Wages Fierce Fight for Voting Rights appeared first on Law Street.

]]>
"McAuliffe" Courtesy of [Kate Wellington via Flickr]

Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe received fierce opposition from Virginia republicans when he released an executive order in late April to restore voting rights to over 200,000 ex-felons. McAuliffe’s opponents argued that he was overstepping his restoration powers in his capacity as governor and that he only had the power to restore voting rights on a case-by-case basis. On July 22, the Virginia Supreme Court ruled that he had indeed overstepped his constitutional powers in a 4-3 decision, shooting down his blanket restoration move. 

When he first took up the fight to restore voting rights for released felons, McAuliffe—who has historically been engaged in national democratic politics as former Chairman of the Democratic National Committee and co-chairman of Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign—was criticized for using restoration as a political tool. With one in five adult African-Americans being disenfranchised in Virginia, republican opponents argued that McAuliffe was trying to “unlock” the minority vote in the wake of the 2016 presidential election.

McAuliffe starkly denies this. Rather, he claims that any citizen who has completed the full term of their sentence shouldn’t be disenfranchised. McAuliffe aims to relieve some of the ex-felons’ burden by restoring voting rights, as disenfranchisement is one of the most significant collateral consequences facing prison releasees.

While the Howell v. McAuliffe decision is certainly a setback, McAuliffe isn’t done with his battle for voting rights quite yet. In a statement released following the July 22 decision McAuliffe promised that he will still pursue restoration. The governor will individually sign 13,000 restoration orders this month and will not stop signing restoration orders until all affected individuals reclaim their right to vote.

Virginia is one of less than ten states that still disenfranchises felons who have completed all terms of their sentence, and is one of less than five states where over 20 percent of African-American adults are disenfranchised. Thus felon disenfranchisement—in addition to the disproportionate incarceration of African-Americans—has the innately undemocratic effect of suppressing minority votes and minority voices.

McAuliffe holds that his action is unpartisan, that he is acting to alleviate the intense injustices that have plagued Virginia’s past. He holds that voting rights ensure certain citizens aren’t being unfairly targeted and excluded from the democratic process.

During his tenure, McAuliffe has championed many issues of inequality. Such instances include initiating preschool programs in impoverished schools/communities, vetoing multiple pieces of legislation aiming to restrict abortion access, and more. The closing sentiment of his statement on the voting rights case sums up the progressive governor’s spirit: “The struggle for civil rights has always been a long and difficult one, but the fight goes on.”

Ashlee Smith
Ashlee Smith is a Law Street Intern from San Antonio, TX. She is a sophomore at American University, pursuing a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and Journalism. Her passions include social policy, coffee, and watching West Wing. Contact Ashlee at ASmith@LawStreetMedia.com.

The post Virginia Governor Wages Fierce Fight for Voting Rights appeared first on Law Street.

]]>
https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/news/virginia-governor-wages-fierce-fight-voting-rights/feed/ 0 54514
Virginia Nondiscrimination Bill Discriminates, Passes House of Delegates https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/news/virginia-nondiscrimination-bill-discriminates-passes-house-delegates/ https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/news/virginia-nondiscrimination-bill-discriminates-passes-house-delegates/#respond Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:55:28 +0000 http://lawstreetmedia.com/?p=50715

Getting discrimination wrong in Virginia.

The post Virginia Nondiscrimination Bill Discriminates, Passes House of Delegates appeared first on Law Street.

]]>
Image Courtesy of [VCU CNS via Flickr]

The Virginia House of Delegates passed a bill Tuesday to grant protections for private businesses holding religious views that refuse service to gay and transgender individuals, along with individuals who have sex outside of marriage.

But House Bill 773, titled the Government Non-Discrimination Act, does exactly the opposite of its intended purpose, at least depending on who you are talking to. 

The bill states,

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a government entity shall not take any discriminatory action against a person, in whole or in part, on the basis that such person believes, speaks, or acts in accordance with a sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction that (i) marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman, (ii) sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage, or (iii) the male sex and the term “man” and the female sex and the term “woman” refer to an individual’s biological sex as determined at birth.

Under this act, state agencies are denied the ability to reduce or cancel funding, contracts, and entitlements; alter tax treatment, or deny other benefits based on beliefs held by private entities such as believing marriage is solely between a man and a woman, sex is only for marriage, and that the terms man and woman are only based on biological sex.

If a company holds these views but doesn’t act on them, then it is not seen as as much of an issue. Saying, “I don’t agree with your lifestyle but we are still going to give you our services” is not as bad as “We are not going to serve you because you are X,Y, or Z.” The problem lies in that this act enables companies to openly discriminate and refuse service to specific groups of people and be completely protected from punishment from the government. Therefore, it seems that something aimed to be nondiscriminatory to one group is completely discriminatory to another.

The bill’s patron–Del. C. Todd Gilbert, R-Shenandoah, said that this bill is another way to protect businesses from the movement to push religion out of the public life, according to the Richmond Times-Dispatch.

Last year Indiana Gov. Mike Pence signed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act bill into law. This bill, like Virginia’s, prohibits the government from “substantially burdening a person’s exercise of religion…” This law allows businesses to deny specific groups of people from services and not be punished–eerily similar to Virginia’s proposed bill. Indiana’s law attracted national backlash and criticism from those who saw this as just another way to discriminate against the LGBTQ community.
In Virginia’s case, many are hopeful that Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe will veto this bill if it were to pass through the Senate. McAuliffe’s office has said that the governor “opposes any legislation that will make Virginia less open and welcoming to people based on their race, gender, religion or sexual orientation.”
Julia Bryant
Julia Bryant is an Editorial Senior Fellow at Law Street from Howard County, Maryland. She is a junior at the University of Maryland, College Park, pursuing a Bachelor’s degree in Journalism and Economics. You can contact Julia at JBryant@LawStreetMedia.com.

The post Virginia Nondiscrimination Bill Discriminates, Passes House of Delegates appeared first on Law Street.

]]>
https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/news/virginia-nondiscrimination-bill-discriminates-passes-house-delegates/feed/ 0 50715
UVA Community Gathers in Support of Martese Johnson https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/news/uva-community-gathers-support-martese-johnson/ https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/news/uva-community-gathers-support-martese-johnson/#comments Thu, 19 Mar 2015 20:11:25 +0000 http://lawstreetmedia.wpengine.com/?p=36390

The UVA community gathered in support of student Martese Johnson who was brutally arrested Tuesday night.

The post UVA Community Gathers in Support of Martese Johnson appeared first on Law Street.

]]>

On Tuesday night, 20-year-old University of Virginia student Martese Johnson was brutally arrested. His treatment has sparked outrage around the country, and has led to protests at the university. Moreover, Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe has called for an investigation into the police officers’ use of force.

Read More: Militarization: Arming the Police Against Against American Citizens

Like many Americans, students at the University of Virginia went out to celebrate St. Patrick’s Day Tuesday night. Martese Johnson, a junior double majoring in Media Studies and Italian, was one of them. Johnson was with friends trying to get into the Trinity Irish Pub, when he was stopped by a bouncer guarding the door. At this point, an agent from the Virginia Department of Adult Beverage Control, or ABC, grabbed Johnson and brought him over to a group of other ABC agents. According to eyewitness Bryan Beaubrun, when Johnson asked the agent to let go and backed away, he was grabbed from behind and then wrestled to the ground by multiple agents. In the process, he hit his head on the ground, and sustained injuries that required ten stitches.

After being arrested, Johnson was charged with resisting arrest, obstructing justice without threats of force, and profane swearing or intoxication in public. He was released on bail later the next morning.

After the release of pictures and footage of the aftermath of Johnson’s arrest, many have been protesting the way in which he was treated. McAuliffe has authorized an investigation into the circumstances, and UVA president Teresa Sullivan has put out a statement detailing her concerns. In an email sent to the student body, she stated:

Today, as U.Va. students, faculty, and staff who share a set of deeply held values, we stand unified in our commitment to seeking the truth about this incident. And we stand united in our belief that equal treatment and equal justice are among our fundamental rights under the law.

She also stressed, however, that details aren’t yet clear at this time, and encouraged anyone with any information about the arrest to come forward and provide eyewitness testimony.

Last night, hundreds of UVA students, as well as faculty and other members of the community, rallied in support of Johnson, who also attended the march. His face clearly still showed signs of his injury from the night before.

Johnson thanked the community for coming out to support him, saying:

This University opened me up. You being here is the reason why I still believe in the community of trust even with a busted head standing here on this stage.

The gathering featured other students speaking about their personal experiences, expressing dismay about how Johnson was treated, and talk about how to move forward. It’s certainly moving to see the university community standing together to protest the inhumane treatment of one of its own, but the fact that such inhumane treatment happened in the first place remains troubling. It’s yet another example in national conversation about race and discrimination that seems to get more complicated and upsetting every day.

Anneliese Mahoney
Anneliese Mahoney is Managing Editor at Law Street and a Connecticut transplant to Washington D.C. She has a Bachelor’s degree in International Affairs from the George Washington University, and a passion for law, politics, and social issues. Contact Anneliese at amahoney@LawStreetMedia.com.

The post UVA Community Gathers in Support of Martese Johnson appeared first on Law Street.

]]>
https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/news/uva-community-gathers-support-martese-johnson/feed/ 1 36390
VA Senator Accepts Bribe & Sells Out Constituents, Incompetence Abounds https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/three-reasons-angry-virginia-senator-bribing-incident/ https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/three-reasons-angry-virginia-senator-bribing-incident/#comments Wed, 11 Jun 2014 19:40:27 +0000 http://lawstreetmedia.wpengine.com/?p=16868

The Virginia GOP allegedly bribed State Senator Phillip Puckett to resign in exchange for a state job for himself and a federal judgeship for his daughter. This whole debacle reeks of incompetence and it's bad for everyone involved.

The post VA Senator Accepts Bribe & Sells Out Constituents, Incompetence Abounds appeared first on Law Street.

]]>

You know what I find hilarious? Incompetence. Seriously, it’s one of my favorite things. Especially when it’s political incompetence. Although to be fair, I probably only find it funny because it keeps me from getting too depressed over the current state of American politics. Are y’all curious as to what my favorite political incompetence moment was this week? Well, it was the incident where Virginia Republicans bribed a Democratic state senator by offering jobs to him and his daughter. By doing so, they gained a majority in the Virginia State Senate. Getting that majority may mean that the attempted Medicaid expansion that Gov. Terry McAuliffe has been working on will be derailed. Confused? Me too. There’s a lot going on here. This issue has a bunch of layers. More specifically, a bunch of layers of incompetence. Let’s break them down.

The Incompetence of Phillip “Sure I’ll Accept a Bribe” Puckett

Let’s work from the inside out. In this case, this first layer of incompetence involves now-resigned Senator Phillip “sure I’ll accept a bribe” Puckett. A Democrat from southwestern Virginia’s Russell County, Puckett received an interesting offer from members of the Virginia GOP. According to inside sources, Puckett was in consideration for a job as Deputy Director of the State Tobacco Commission and his daughter has been waiting around to be confirmed to a federal judgeship. The deal, allegedly, was that they would finally get approved if Puckett resigned. So…he resigned.

Although much-deserved backlash has led to Puckett’s announcement that he won’t be seeking the Tobacco Commission job, it seems that his daughter will get her appointment after all. And the Republicans will get what they wanted — Democrats won’t control the Virginia Senate, which likely means that Medicaid expansion in the state is dead. If this is all true, which it seems to be, I have just a few words for Puckett.

Sounds about right. Because if Puckett did take a bribe to leave his elected position as a state senator, he is a selfish bastard. People elected him based on his beliefs. And when you’re elected by the people…well then you work for the people. That means those voters are counting on you. That means that you probably shouldn’t let them down over your own selfish desires. If you wanted a job that you could leave without letting people down, you probably shouldn’t have become a public servant. Maybe Puckett left for some other reason; it does happen. But it’s still a crap move. Because at the end of the day he let down people who count on him.

And on the issue of Medicaid expansion, there were a ton of people who desperately could have used his help. As the Washington Post pointed out, there are about 3,000 of his constituents who have no health insurance. People who could have had their lives changed by Medicaid expansion. Puckett owes every single one of them a damn apology.

The Incompetence of the Virginia GOP

This award goes to the Republicans who bribed him — although incompetence is probably not the right word, because their plan did actually work. Instead, let’s call it nastiness. This is not our political process. Our political process relies on everyone going out and voting. And then after we’ve voted we have elected officials, and hypothetically we’re done there. We do this cool thing where we get to vote them out if we want to, we just need to let them serve out the term first. In some places, we can even recall our elected officials.

You know what we can’t do? Be giant babies and bribe them. I mean I guess we can, because Virginia Republicans just did. But we shouldn’t. It’s cheap, it’s obnoxious, it’s immature. And guess what? It’s also wrong.

The Incompetence of Everyone Who Doesn’t Value Compromise

And that brings me to our last layer of incompetence. It’s a big one. A huge one, actually. Because it’s all of us.

Yup, you. All of you. And me too, if we’re being fair. Without sounding prematurely ancient here, I remember growing up when compromise was a good thing. In school we learned how to compromise to end fights between friends. At home, I learned how to compromise with my parents so we all got what we wanted. And I remember a time when the word “compromise” wasn’t a synonym for evil when used in a political context the way it is now.

We disagree over Medicaid expansion, OK. While I have my own personal feelings about the issue, I recognize that there is a valid argument to be made for the opposing side. But this would all be a hell of a lot easier if we didn’t assume that our politicians can get exactly what they promised us. Because they can’t. They can’t stick to their guns so concretely that compromise becomes impossible. As we learned this week, when that happens you get crap like Puckett accepting a bribe.

So yeah, these layers of incompetence include us too. Let’s reclaim the word “compromise.” Let’s make sure this is the last time we facilitate an environment in which a bribe is a real possibility. Because otherwise, our elected officials will try this again.

Anneliese Mahoney (@AMahoney8672) is Lead Editor at Law Street and a Connecticut transplant to Washington D.C. She has a Bachelor’s degree in International Affairs from the George Washington University, and a passion for law, politics, and social issues. Contact Anneliese at amahoney@LawStreetMedia.com.

Featured image courtesy of [Torbakhopper via Flickr]

Anneliese Mahoney
Anneliese Mahoney is Managing Editor at Law Street and a Connecticut transplant to Washington D.C. She has a Bachelor’s degree in International Affairs from the George Washington University, and a passion for law, politics, and social issues. Contact Anneliese at amahoney@LawStreetMedia.com.

The post VA Senator Accepts Bribe & Sells Out Constituents, Incompetence Abounds appeared first on Law Street.

]]>
https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/three-reasons-angry-virginia-senator-bribing-incident/feed/ 1 16868