Sharing a last name with the president could make you unpopular in some circles, as Tiffany Trump learned while attending New York Fashion Week.

During the Philipp Plein show on Monday, the youngest Trump daughter was seen sitting by herself after fashion editors allegedly switched seats to avoid sitting next to her.

Former Wall Street Journal columnist Christina Binkley tweeted a photo of Trump from the show that she captioned: “Nobody wants to sit next to Tiffany Trump at Philipp Plein, so they moved and the seats by her are empty.”

Nobody wants to sit next to Tiffany Trump at Philipp Plein, so they moved and the seats by her are empty. pic.twitter.com/XcxNYI6Kf8

— Christina Binkley (@BinkleyOnStyle) February 14, 2017

Empty seats next to Tiffany Trump. pic.twitter.com/axvYJAFupl

— Christina Binkley (@BinkleyOnStyle) February 14, 2017

Nikki Ogunnaike, senior fashion editor at “Elle,” tweeted that the show started late due to the last-minute seat changes, with editors “fleeing” to not have to sit close to Tiffany.

The incident caused quite a stir online, with many people calling both Binkley and the fashion editors bullies for posting the photos and seemingly punishing Tiffany for her father’s actions. “The View” co-host Whoopi Goldberg was especially peeved by the snub, and defended Tiffany during Wednesday’s episode of her show.

“You know what, Tiffany? I’m supposed to go to a couple more shows. I don’t know what’s going to happen, but I’m coming to sit with you,” Goldberg said. “Because nobody’s talking politics. You’re looking at fashion! She doesn’t want to talk about her dad! She’s looking at the fashion!”

Goldberg’s co-host Sara Haines also chimed in saying, “it’s almost like we live in a time where people are saying that ‘because it’s a Trump’ it’s ok to bully her.”

.@WhoopiGoldberg reacts to editors not wanting to sit next to Tiffany Trump at fashion week: “Girl, I will sit next to you!” pic.twitter.com/FcNDqaw1Pn

— The View (@TheView) February 15, 2017

Tiffany accepted Goldberg’s invitation via Twitter.

Thank you @WhoopiGoldberg I’d love to sit with you too!

— Tiffany Ariana Trump (@TiffanyATrump) February 15, 2017

Three days after her original tweet, Binkley followed up to clarify that the seats surrounding Tiffany were only empty for about two minutes before other people sat down. Then the designer’s sister made those people move so she could sit there for the show.

“It’s easy to assume from a photograph that she sat there, humiliated, with empty seats by her, which wasn’t the case,” Binkley said.

However, online critics pointed out that if Binkley was upset that people thought she was a bully, maybe she shouldn’t have waited three days to clarify what happened.

The designer of the show also spoke out against the editors’ treatment of Tiffany, saying that a young girl shouldn’t be humiliated because her father has political opinions that people don’t like.

Hopefully the rest of NYFW goes much better for the first daughter.

Emma Von Zeipel

Emma Von Zeipel is a staff writer at Law Street Media. She is originally from one of the islands of Stockholm, Sweden. After working for Democratic Voice of Burma in Thailand, she ended up in New York City. She has a BA in journalism from Stockholm University and is passionate about human rights, good books, horses, and European chocolate. Contact Emma at EVonZeipel@LawStreetMedia.com.

The post Tiffany Trump Shunned by Editors at New York Fashion Week appeared first on Law Street.

The Kardashians. Whether you love to hate them, or hate to love them, one thing is for sure–you just can’t stop talking about them. But if you’re tall, beautiful, and coincidentally a model walking in Kanye West’s New York Fashion Week (NYFW) show you might want to hold off on any K-clan gossiping you have planned, because it could end up being a $10 million mistake.

According to the Mirror, the 38-year-old rapper/designer/T-Swift interrupter required all models in his Yeezy Season 2 show to sign non-disclosure agreements effectively banning them from talking about him, Kim, or any other member of the Kardashian-West family.

Kanye isn’t playing games with Yeezy Season 2: http://t.co/ZHPrh9Aoxo pic.twitter.com/9LD3tRWzsg

— Complex Style (@ComplexStyle) September 16, 2015

According to one Mirror source,

Kanye’s hacked off some really high-profile models by asking them to sign the agreement, particularly because it stated that he could sue them for up to $10 million if they spoke out about him.

Some of the models flat out refused, saying they’d rather not be associated with him and his “media frenzy.” Others reluctantly signed.

This isn’t the first time West or the Kardashians have required their “people” to sign non-disclosure agreements. Take Kim and Kanye’s $12 million Italian wedding, for example. Not wanting to ruin their E! wedding special, all guests in attendance were obligated to sign confidentiality agreements and have their phones confiscated in order to keep their nuptials private and out of the media’s hands.

However, the models weren’t the only ones pissed at West over his NYFW antics–some of his fellow designers, specifically Anna Bowen, were too. Earlier that week Bowen blasted West, calling him “unethical” for forcing her to reschedule her show after he added his last minute to the packed runway schedule. West slated his buzzworthy presentation for the same time as Bowen’s, which pressured her into moving her show or risk no one showing up.

She told Women’s Wear Daily,

Kanye knows he is a media sensation and it is just not ethical to do this. It’s like we are David and he is Goliath. […]

We have put our heart and soul into our show, and should not be stepped on like this. Our show date has been scheduled for months and we have to move our date, which is a logistical nightmare.

So in other words Kanye effectively pissed off NYFW designers and models in one fell swoop. Who knows, the confidentiality agreements may just be a scare tactic. Hell, I wouldn’t be surprised if this was just one big tactfully planned publicity stunt by Ye’s camp aimed to bring more eyes to his last minute submission. Conspiracy theories aside, I will admit that it is slightly odd to see a family that has amassed so much of their wealth by living in the public eye try to retain anything private.

Alexis Evans

Alexis Evans is an Assistant Editor at Law Street and a Buckeye State native. She has a Bachelor’s Degree in Journalism and a minor in Business from Ohio University. Contact Alexis at aevans@LawStreetMedia.com.

The post Kanye Threatens to Sue Models if They Talk About Him or Kim During NYFW appeared first on Law Street.

Fashion trend website Refinery29 published an article recently with the headline “The Jeremy Scott Effect: How ‘Stealing’ Logos Can Technically Be Legal.” The second I came across it, I obviously began to develop a couple of opinions. Is it really technically legal? Are some logos really just up for grabs? I’m not so sure.

The Fall 2015 collection of Scott’s namesake line, presented in February at New York Fashion Week, is rather lacking in commercial logos. Rather, he saved the really fun stuff for Moschino where he sent Looney Toons-emblazoned sweatshirts down the runway at last week’s Milan show. Scott has also brought his own versions of classic American brands like McDonald’s and Barbie to the line.

In the case of the McDonald’s and Barbie capsule collections, Scott always alters logos to put his own spin on them. So technically he’s not stealing anything. Even Moschino’s version of the Barbie logo is distinctly different from any past or present logos. As a matter of fact, the collection was more of a collaboration as Scott even designed a doll for Mattel.

Refinery29 does go on to explain that designers need to get permission from a company to use its logo, as Opening Ceremony did with Kodak. But if anything, it’s not a matter of “stealing” logos, but rather clothing companies collaborating with other consumer brands. T-shirt company Junk Food, known for using images from brands like Coca-Cola as well as bands and tv shows, was one of the originators of this notion. Wherever they sell their products, there’s always a note crediting a company’s featured image.

While a lot of areas in fashion law are fuzzy, in this case it’s pretty clear; there’s no technical way to steal another company’s logo. It’s all a matter of strict licensing practices and creative collaborations.

Katherine Fabian

Katherine Fabian is a recent graduate of Fordham University’s College at Lincoln Center. She is a freelance writer and yoga teacher who hopes to one day practice fashion law and defend the intellectual property rights of designers. Contact Katherine at staff@LawStreetMedia.com.

The post Why There’s Nothing Legal About “Stealing” Logos appeared first on Law Street.