Since its inception in 2006, the (RED) campaign has reached across industries to create (RED) products, the sales of which go directly toward funding anti-retroviral treatments. This month, (RED) is launching a new initiative called Eat (RED) that utilizes the tagline “86 AIDS.” Eat (RED) involves cooking lessons via Snapchat, an Instagram contest and partnerships with celebrity chefs such as Mario Batalli. The (RED) campaign is looking to engage restaurants, bars, and food trucks in its fundraising drive–whether that engagement will involve drawing attention to HIV/AIDS or donating percentages of certain meals is yet to be determined.

Eat (RED) is an interesting concept, but it is being rolled out as a special event that will last only one month as opposed to a lasting campaign. Whereas (RED) products such as clothing, accessories and headphones have longevity and have continued production over several years, Eat (RED) is a one-off.

Partnering with local restaurants has long been a smart move for regional charities and causes–profit sharing is common practice for several restaurants. Buy a given meal at a given restaurant on a given night and 15 percent of the sale will go to the charity the restaurant has partnered with. However, Eat (RED) has not chosen to center itself on a given city or even a certain group of restaurants.

It is admirable to be open to partners from all over the world but the relaxed nature of the Eat (RED) partnership may be actually hindering the efficacy of the campaign. Eat (RED) asks restauranteurs to contact the (RED) organization if they want to participate but only a handful of restaurants have decided to join in thus far. This does not mean that the (RED) campaign hasn’t attempted to recruit more partners but a restaurant’s participation in the Eat (RED) campaign is essentially dependent on whether they are on the mailing list for the (RED) campaign or happen to come across the Instagram contest on social media. The restaurants that are participating in the campaign have not necessarily been promoting it actively, so there is no following being built on social media platforms that would alert other restaurants to the campaign’s existence. Eat (RED) is an excellent idea, but its execution seems to be falling flat as we move closer to the end of June.

Consider a different color–orange. Last month, on National Gun Violence Awareness Day, groups like Everytown for Gun Safety set out to turn America orange, encouraging people to wear orange, alter their photos to have an orange filter on social media, and even light up buildings with an orange glow. The event was a success largely because it was organized on a local level. Small rallies at transport stations, parks and other public meeting places were compounded into thousands of participants in the day of awareness across the country. Eat (RED) is working for a different cause, with a different set of resources at its disposal, but it should consider taking a page out of Everytown’s book. Eat (RED)’s Instagram contest may reach the same popularity as Everytown’s orange profile pictures but unless money is being spent, the Eat (RED) campaign may never gain ground as a fundraising campaigns. Organizing small, local events can be much more effective than issuing a blanket invite, therefore Eat (RED) could look to partner with a few restaurants at a time in a single city rather than launching a national campaign. New York and DC already have a Restaurant Week, so why not a (RED) Restaurant Week? The campaign could receive more donations and reach more people if it tackles one city at a time.

Jillian Sequeira

Jillian Sequeira was a member of the College of William and Mary Class of 2016, with a double major in Government and Italian. When she’s not blogging, she’s photographing graffiti around the world and worshiping at the altar of Elon Musk and all things Tesla. Contact Jillian at Staff@LawStreetMedia.com

The post Eat (RED): The HIV/AIDS Event That No One Has Noticed? appeared first on Law Street.

Wine tasting can be an abstract art. As the pourer dribbles a tragically small amount of wine into your glass, you glance at the tasting notes. You definitely taste the dark cherries. After another sip you detect leather and possibly a hint of dirt.

Your friends think you’re a wine tasting genius. But truthfully, you kind of just made all of that up. In fact, while drinking the same wine alone later on, you start to wonder if it ever tasted like leather at all. Maybe you were just carried away by a tide of wine snobbery. It’s been known to happen.

Your wine tasting experience can be more than just an effusive bubbling of wine poetry. While wine tasting is an art, science explains everything you see, smell, and taste. Here’s what you need to know about the science of wine tasting to back up your assertions.

How to Taste Wine

Before we get into the science behind wine tasting, let’s review how to do it. Winefolly.com has an excellent infographic with some basic steps to keep in mind when wine tasting: look, smell, taste, and conclude.

Now let’s find out what scientific factors contribute to each step.

Look

When you look in your glass, your wine should be red, white, or something in between. Step one complete. Now, why the different colors when all grape juice is essentially clear? The answer lies in grape skin.

Grape skins contain little compounds called anthocyanins. During winemaking, acids in the wine react with anthocyanins to produce velvety red hues. The acid level of the wine is especially important in achieving this red color; when anthocyanins meet an alkaline solution, they’ll produce completely different colors like blue and green. Anthocyanins are highly reactive, they’re even responsible for the changing colors of autumn leaves.

Anthocyanins continue their complex reactions during aging, forming complexes that create subtle differences in wine color. While anthocyanins decrease over time, the complexes they’ve formed ensure the wine will stay a shade of red.

Many other subtle factors contribute to the range of red wine colors you see, including:

• Variations in grape skin thickness and pigment;
• How long the grape was on the vine;
• How long the skins were soaked in the wine before and after fermentation; and
• The handling of the grape skins. For example, macerating the skins brings out other pigment compounds, like carotenoids, that add even more color to the wine.

To make white wine, juice is pressed and separated from the skins very early on and no red pigmentation develops. For a rosé, winemakers leave skins in the grape juice for a short time.

What to remember? Grape skins, and the reactions among different compounds they contain, determine wine color.

Smell

Wine aroma stems from the complex interaction of volatile compounds present in the wine.

When you smell a glass of wine, odor-active volatiles travel through your nose and connect with odor-binding proteins in your olfactory epithelium, or the area in your nose that recognizes odors. From there, receptors pass the odors onto the brain for processing and interpretation.

But there’s more to the aromatic experience than the first smell. Much of the liquid’s perceived aroma releases after you swallow and exhale. The motion releases even more aroma compounds into your system.

Variations in the enzymes, microflora, and mucus in your mouth further complicate aroma, altering how different people perceive odors. So aroma might be relative after all. It’s one of the most abstract aspects of tasting wine.

You can make wine tasting more concrete by recognizing and articulating what you smell. Ann C. Noble’s wine wheel will help you do this. She took information from several wine descriptive analysis studies and picked concrete terms over abstract ones to create the wheel. Take a look at the video below for more information on the wheel.

Aroma judgement might also be clouded by other senses. Researchers from the National Institute for Agronomic Research in Montpellier, France found that perceived smell is highly influenced by appearance. They noticed that wine critics frequently used red or dark objects to describe the smell of red wine, like raspberries or tobacco. The critics similarly used golden hues as descriptors when tasting white wine, like honey and apricots. When they asked students with little wine-drinking experience to describe wine, they saw similar results.

Then the researchers gave subjects two white wines, one of which had been colored with unobtrusive red dye. The subjects still described the disguised white wine in terms of red-hued objects, proving that our noses might be highly influenced by our eyes.

What to remember? Just because the person next to you smells asparagus doesn’t mean you have to. If they try to argue with you, tell them that wine aromas are subject to complex interactions of volatile compounds that people perceive differently. You could both be right.

Taste

Now it’s time for the best part–the tasting. But how did the wine in your glass end up tasting so much different from the grape juice it once was? Wine is made through an intricate series of interactions between different compounds in grapes. These compounds are released and heightened during various winemaking processes like crushing, fermentation, and aging.

Since many compounds are released and intermingle in the process of making wine, it’s hard to pinpoint a flavor or aroma to its chemical cause. But knowing some of the basic compounds is step one. The chemical classes of compounds found in wine include esters, alcohols, acids, lactones, carbonyl compounds, acetals, phenols, sulfur-containing volatiles, nitrogen-containing volatiles as well as other miscellaneous substances. Below are some examples of how different substances affect the flavor of wine. (Please note that aroma and flavor are closely linked. Many of the compounds below contribute to both the flavor and aroma of wine.)

• Acids: Acid in wine comes from what is naturally present in the grape and what is produced as a byproduct of fermentation. Other than yielding tart flavors and balancing sweetness, acid’s role in wine is highly reactive. When acid meets substances like esters and alcohols, the subsequent reactions can produce a range of flavors from fruity to tart. Acid also plays a key role in fighting off microorganisms that cause wine spoilage.
• Tannins: Tannins are the phenol polymers that are extracted from grape skins during fermentation. They’re more closely associated with “mouthfeel” than actual flavor. Tannins don’t react with olfactory receptors, but bind to the proteins on the surface of mouth cells and change their viscosity temporarily. This dries out the tongue and provides that familiar “puckery” sensation.
• Sugars: Sugars do more than just determine the overall sweetness of wine. Sugar enables wine’s alcohol content. During fermentation, yeast converts the glucose and fructose in grape juice into alcohol and carbon dioxide. The exact sugar content of the grape can vary based on subtle differences in ripeness, making fermentation a very complicated process to perfect.
• Esters: Esters are naturally occurring aromatic compounds in grapes that are heightened through fermentation and when exposed to acid. A multitude of esters are released during the winemaking process that interact to produce fruity and floral flavors and aromas along with other subtle variations. For example, lactones are the specific esters that impart creamy smells like vanilla, coconut, and butter.
• Pyrazines: Pyrazines produce herbaceous smells in wine. Think green peppers and green beans. They’re found in extremely low quantities in grapes but they have such a low flavor threshold that even small amounts can emerge and alter the flavor of the wine.
• Terpenes: Terpenes are organic compounds that can make wine smell and taste sweet, floral, resinous, or herbaceous. A specific example is pinene, the terpene that gives pine trees their familiar aroma.
• Thiols: Thiols are organosulfur compounds that can taste and smell fruity or earthy when controlled. As these are the same compounds that give skunks their signature scents, too much thiol in wine produces an unpleasant odor.

That was just a sampling of the compounds that interact in a glass of wine to provide the symphony of aromas and flavors you experience. In addition to the interactions of compounds, tiny variations in fermentation and an individual’s unique flavor receptors further impact perceived flavor. That’s why two people can taste two different things in the same bottle of wine.

What to remember? Wine can contain a full range of robust flavors that taste like anything from vanilla to green beans. It’s not because wine is stuffed with additives, these flavors are a result of natural compounds interacting in the magic of wine making.

Why do we put wine in barrels?

Any wine tasting will inevitably include what sort of barrel or tank the wine was aged in, including where it came from. But what does it mean?

Even when wine is in a cask or a barrel, it’s changing chemically and absorbing qualities of the wood. The barrel’s wood contains compounds and tannins of its own that influence the wine. Barrel wood contains the following:

• Vanillin, which imparts vanilla notes. It’s released when lignin in oak breaks down. Toasting the wood accelerates the degradation and release of vanillin and the developing of flavors.
• Furfural, which is a byproduct of carbohydrate degradation. It gives wine a toasty-sweet aroma.
• Lactones, which are esters that impart woody aromas.
• Terpenes, which provide tea and tobacco flavors.
• Hydrolysable tannins, which combine with tannins in grapes to affect the mouthfeel of the wine. The types of tannins in wood are heat sensitive, so winemakers can manipulate them through various barrel-making processes.
• Hemicellulose, which are wood polymers that convert into sugars when heated. They add more toasty, caramelized aromas.

As no two trees are the same, no two wine barrels will be exactly the same. Different types of wood are know for different characteristics, such as those described below.

• French oak contains the highest levels of tannins. French oak is more porous than other types of wood, providing more opportunity to impart elements of the wood into the wine. Caryophyllene and copaene are examples of compounds found in French oak that are responsible for some popular spice flavors.
• American oak is a sturdier wood with more hemicellulose and lignin which typically results in warm vanilla flavors.
• Eastern European oak is similar to French oak but is smaller and grows slowly. The hemicellulose in this wood breaks down easily to form more intense toasty aromas.

Apart from these reactions, wine slowly and slightly oxidizes in the barrel. This tames bitterness and can often change color. Aging wine in stainless steel doesn’t produce nearly as many reactions. That type of container is typically used to preserve the unique flavors of the fruit and keep all oxygen out.

How about terroir?

Terroir refers to the conditions that grapes were grown in including soil, sunlight, and water. Many believe the grapes’ milieu contributes to the final flavor of the wine. The word terroir originated as a name for soil, but it turns out wine terroir might be more dependent on climate than dirt.

Some experts argue that climate might have more impact than soil because it’s very difficult to prove that vines absorb minerals from the ground. Rocks and soil would have to undergo multiple reactions for their elemental particles to become soluble. From there, they would have to get to the vine’s roots and then to various parts of the grapevine. Fermentation and other winemaking processes could mask any small effect the minerals in soil had on the vine.

None of these speculation are conclusive and even geologists are getting into the terroir mystery. This would just be a fun tidbit to throw out if the subject comes up.

Whoa whoa whoa, what about the swirling?

Don’t worry, swirling wasn’t invented just to make you spill wine on yourself. Swirling and aerating exposes wine to oxygen, which is actually good just before tasting. The actions lead to evaporation. In this case, undesirable compounds like sulfites, sulfides, and ethanol typically evaporate first. These substances can make wine smell rotten or taste too alcoholic. Exposing the wine to oxygen before sipping helps to decrease these bitter notes.

Conclude (AKA Talk About it Pompously)

This is when you leverage what you know about wine tasting to have a grounded discussion instead of indiscriminately spewing impressive adjectives.

Let’s go back to the cherry-tobacco-dirt wine we started with. Now you can explain to your friends that its brilliant ruby color is a result of grape skin compounds called anthocyanins. You can tell them you’re not just swirling your glass to look cool, but to get rid of sulfides and other potentially bitter compounds. Explain that the dark cherry flavor is probably a result of esters reacting with acids in the wine. And that dirt smell? Let’s call it earthy and chalk it up to just the right amount of the organosulfur compounds.

Every glass of wine is full of science. Chemical reactions in every step of the winemaking process work in unison to produce the magical liquid set before you. Even if your palate needs work, appreciating the scientific wonder in wine is the first step toward becoming a true connoisseur.

Resources

Primary

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry: Beyond the Characterization of Wine Aroma Compounds

PLOS One: How Subtle is the “Terroir” Effect? Chemistry-Related Signatures of Two “Climats de Bourgogne”

New Scientist: A Whiff of Untruth

Nature: Alcohol and Science: The Grapes of Rock

Ronald S. Jackson: Wine Science: Principles and Applications

U.S. Forest Service: Oak Aging and Wine

Additional

Chemical Heritage Foundation: Scientia Vitis

Popular Science: Does A Wine’s ‘Terroir’ Really Matter? Study Says Yes

Compound Chem: The Key Chemicals in Red Wine – Colour, Flavour, and Potential Health Benefits

Wine Folly: Where Wine Flavors Come From: The Science of Wine Aromas

Science News: Wine’s Chemical Secrets: Can Science Bring Us Better Wine?

Restaurant Business: Wine Aging

Wines and Vines: Exploring the Science of Terroir: Science May Support Link Between Climate and Wine Quality–Not Soil-Minerality

Wines and Vines: Picking Out the Pepper: How Aussie Researchers Uncovered a Key Red Wine Aromatic Compound

Wine Spectator: Ask Dr. Vinny

Napa Valley Register: What Makes a Red Wine?

Practical Winery: Persistence of Vegetal Characters in Winegrapes and Wine

Ashley Bell

Ashley Bell communicates about health and wellness every day as a non-profit Program Manager. She has a Bachelor’s degree in Business and Economics from the College of William and Mary, and loves to investigate what changes in healthy policy and research might mean for the future. Contact Ashley at staff@LawStreetMedia.com.

The post The Science of Wine Tasting appeared first on Law Street.

If you’re looking for a weird political race to follow during the 2014 elections, I have a suggestion for you: Kansas. There are actually multiple weird political races to watch there, so get ready to keep your eyes focused on the Sunflower State come November.

It’s important to point out that Kansas is a solidly red state. So red in fact, that until fairly recently, it was pretty much assumed that a Republican was going to win both the gubernatorial and senatorial races. Let’s face it, the last Democratic Senator from Kansas was a man named George McGill, who stopped serving in 1939. But the assumed Republican domination isn’t looking so certain now.

Let’s start with the current Senate race, because there’s been a lot of news there in the last 24 hours. Up to this point in the race there have been three candidates: current Republican Senator Pat Roberts, Democratic challenger Chad Taylor, and Independent Greg Orman. Pat Roberts is pretty conservative — socially, economically, and diplomatically. He’s also not that popular. He’s been a Senator from Kansas for three terms now, and has been accused of being out of touch with the average voter. He doesn’t even have a residence in the state anymore. He narrowly defeated a primary challenge from a tea partier named Milton Wolf, and after that primary he had an approval rating of 27 percent. He also hasn’t been running a very good campaign, probably because he’s never really needed to before. In 2008, he beat his Democratic challenger by more than 20 points; in 2002 he had no Democrat challenger and won with 82 percent of the vote. Through his three terms in the Senate, and three in the House of Representatives, he’s never won an election by less than 60 percent.

But now, things are getting weird. Taylor has been faring surprisingly well. The real standout start though, is Orman. He’s a good candidate — moderate, pro-business, and he’s been running a solid campaign. He has a real shot to win this race. Taylor even announced yesterday that he was stepping down, which watchers assumed would up Orman’s chances even more, given that Democratic voters are way more likely to rally around him than Roberts.

Complicated and weird enough for you, yet? Well I hope not, because there’s more fun ahead. The Republican Secretary of State Kris Kobach has said that Taylor can’t remove himself from the ballot. He claimed that after reviewing Taylor’s request, his team had not found “sufficient evidence” to show that Taylor would be incapable of serving the duties of the office. This is good news for Roberts — now the liberal vote will remain split between Taylor and Orman.

So, the Democrats are suing the Republicans to get the Democrat off the ballot in order to give the Independent candidate a good chance. Yes, it’s as complicated as it sounds. And that right there is the state of politics in Kansas right now.

In comparison, Kansas’s weird gubernatorial race seems almost calm. Here’s a great in-depth look into what’s happening, but long story short, a Democrat named Paul Davis is doing pretty well against Tea Party-backed uber-conservative Sam Brownback. He’s wildly unpopular, and Davis is capitalizing on the Republican split between Tea Party and establishment. He’s received the endorsement of many prominent Republicans in the state who don’t want to see Brownback receive another term and damage the Republican reputation even more.

Only one thing is certain: Kansas will definitely be fun to watch this November.

—

Anneliese Mahoney (@AMahoney8672) is Lead Editor at Law Street and a Connecticut transplant to Washington D.C. She has a Bachelor’s degree in International Affairs from the George Washington University, and a passion for law, politics, and social issues. Contact Anneliese at amahoney@LawStreetMedia.com.

Featured image courtesy of [Sean Ganann via Flickr]

Anneliese Mahoney

Anneliese Mahoney is Managing Editor at Law Street and a Connecticut transplant to Washington D.C. She has a Bachelor’s degree in International Affairs from the George Washington University, and a passion for law, politics, and social issues. Contact Anneliese at amahoney@LawStreetMedia.com.

The post Kansas’ Topsy-Turvy Election Year appeared first on Law Street.