Mark Warner – Law Street https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com Law and Policy for Our Generation Wed, 13 Nov 2019 21:46:22 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.8 100397344 What You Need to Know About the Senate Intelligence Committee’s Russia Probe https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/politics-blog/senate-intelligence-committees-russia-probe/ https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/politics-blog/senate-intelligence-committees-russia-probe/#respond Fri, 31 Mar 2017 19:10:54 +0000 https://lawstreetmedia.com/?p=59943

A look at where we are with the Senate Intelligence Committee's Russia investigation

The post What You Need to Know About the Senate Intelligence Committee’s Russia Probe appeared first on Law Street.

]]>
"Sen. Mark Warner" Courtesy of New America: License (CC BY 2.0)

With a new story coming to light seemingly every single day, there’s no question that all the news about Russia and its interference in the 2016 election is confusing. So, it’s fair to assume that a lot of people were surprised on Wednesday when Senators Richard Burr, the Republican chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, and Mark Warner, the Democratic Vice Chairman, held a joint news conference discussing the Senate’s Russia probe.

The biggest takeaway from the press conference was Warner’s comment on one part of Russia’s strategy to destabilize the election, which concerned the Kremlin hiring 1,000 paid trolls to generate fake anti-Clinton stories targeted at specific areas in the U.S. Warner did not elaborate on where those specific areas were, but he alluded to the committee investigating trolls targeting Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. The significance of Russia targeting these three specific states is simple: they are all swing states that President Donald Trump narrowly won. They were also the three states included in the unsuccessful recounts prompted by Jill Stein.

“An outside foreign adversary effectively sought to hijack the most critical democratic process, the election of a president, and in that process, decided to favor one candidate over another,” Warner said.

The second biggest takeaway was Burr’s comments on Russia’s “active involve[ment]” in tampering with France and Germany’s upcoming elections. “What we might assess is a very covert effort in 2016 in the United Sates is a very overt effort as well as covert in Germany and France,” Burr said. “We feel part of our responsibility is to educate the rest of the world about what’s going on because it’s now into character assassination of candidates.”

The news conference was an attempt to assure the public that the Senate’s investigation would not be mired in controversy and unprofessionalism. Burr and Warner seemed acutely aware of the fact that one big story was Republican House Intelligence Committee Chariman Devin Nunes’ bizarre actions over the past week. “Let me set the ground rules real quick. We’ll answer anything about the Senate Intelligence Committee’s investigation. We will not take questions on the House Intelligence Committee,” Burr said as he smirked and as Warner audibly laughed.

The two senators also outlined their plans to interview 20 witnesses in public or private hearings for their investigation, including Jared Kushner and the ever-controversial Paul Manafort, as was first reported by the Times. Burr also added that the committee had already held conversations with some people, most notably Michael Flynn.

Yesterday morning, the committee held its first public hearing, which led to two startling revelations. The first was that Marco Rubio’s presidential campaign and Senate reelection campaign were subject to social media attacks and hacks of campaign staff that came from computers with IP addresses located in Russia. The other revelation centered around testimony from Clinton Watts, a fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute and  Center For Cyber and a senior fellow at the George Washington University’s Center for Cyber and Homeland Security. He said that Russia has a cache of false information campaigns that it can use against politicians from both sides of the aisle and that Trump also uses false narratives against his opponents.

Watts explained that Russia’s social media smear campaigns are “not all automated” and “not all human.” “You can have someone engaging with you as an individual and using a bot to amplify their message… or [they] can create more personas on Twitter, for example,” Watts said. A Twitter user showed evidence of this strategy back in February:

As the House Intelligence Committee is still mired in chaos and discord, the tone of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s first public hearing was serious and maintained a sense of decorum. “The vice chairman and I realize that if we politicize this process, our efforts will likely fail,” Burr said to begin the hearing. “The public deserves to hear the truth about possible Russian involvement in our elections, how they came to be involved, how we may have failed to prevent that involvement, what actions were taken in response, if any, and what we plan to do to ensure the integrity of future free elections at the heart of our democracy.”

Here’s hoping that the committee’s investigation, which looks like it will take quite a while, upholds that standard.

Austin Elias-De Jesus
Austin is an editorial intern at Law Street Media. He is a junior at The George Washington University majoring in Political Communication. You can usually find him reading somewhere. If you can’t find him reading, he’s probably taking a walk. Contact Austin at Staff@Lawstreetmedia.com.

The post What You Need to Know About the Senate Intelligence Committee’s Russia Probe appeared first on Law Street.

]]>
https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/politics-blog/senate-intelligence-committees-russia-probe/feed/ 0 59943
Hillary’s In, But Who Will She Run With? https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/elections/hillarys-will-run/ https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/elections/hillarys-will-run/#comments Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:19:13 +0000 http://lawstreetmedia.wpengine.com/?p=37740

Hillary Clinton's running for president; who would she choose as her VP?

The post Hillary’s In, But Who Will She Run With? appeared first on Law Street.

]]>
Image courtesy of [Rona Proudfoot via Flickr]

It’s official–Hillary Clinton will be the Democratic nominee for president. For weeks, any other legitimate potential Democratic challengers have been backing away very quickly from a nomination consideration. Honestly, with the way this race is probably going to go we might as well just have the convention right now, because Hills is definitely sitting pretty.

So now we turn our eyes to the much more interesting and significantly less important race on the Democratic side–who will be Hillary Clinton’s Vice Presidential nominee?

Given that everyone is still freaking out over her announcement, it’s probably best to let the dust settle before coming up with any concrete answer. But that doesn’t mean we can’t have some fun speculating in the meantime.

Speculation about who Clinton may pick includes a lot of mid-to-high-level players in the Democratic Party. Both sitting Virginia senators, Tim Kaine and Mark Warner, might be legitimate choices, as they are from a crucial swing state. Martin O’Malley, Governor of Maryland, and long considered a potential contender to fight Clinton for the nomination, could also make a strong partner.

Julian Castro, the Housing and Urban Development Secretary and former mayor of San Antonio, could also be a tempting second in command. While Texas isn’t purple yet, it may be relatively soon, and capitalizing on that in advance could be a smart overall strategy for the Democratic Party. Castro is Hispanic, a voting bloc that has become a priority to win for both the Democrat and Republican tickets. Furthermore, Castro is 40 years old–30 years Clinton’s junior. In addition to balancing out her perspective, Castro will look young and virile standing next to Clinton, and assuage those who have concerns about her health.

There are also questions over whether Clinton would only limit the search to men. There are a lot of female rising stars in the Democratic Party, including Elizabeth Warren, the popular senator from Massachusetts. She has said she’s not planning on running, despite the fact that she’d presumably have quite a bit of grassroots support if she chose to. More liberal than Clinton in many ways, including on financial issues and ties to Wall Street, she could energize young liberals who are still hurting from the 2008 recession.

Also from the ranks of Democratic women there’s been talk of Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N). That one seems like a long shot though, despite the fact that Gillibrand took over Clinton’s seat when she vacated it to become Secretary of State. She’s gone after some big, important issues in her time in the Senate, such as sexual assault in the military; however, in addition to the fact that Clinton and Gillibrand are seen as somewhat similar, there are concerns over whether a ticket with two people from the same state could even work. The 12th Amendment effectively prohibits that both the President and Vice President be from the same state, but exactly what that means is somewhat difficult to parse out. Clinton and Gillibrand both served as Senators from New York, but does that make them “from” the same state? That would be an issue that would have to be decided, but the idea that she chooses Gillibrand is unlikely to begin with. It could however, impact any other possible VPs from New York, including Governor Andrew Cuomo.

There are plenty of other names for consideration on this list. There’s also Senator Amy Klobuchar from Minnesota. She was an attorney with a strong record on crime and safety before being elected to the Senate. Senator Cory Booker is another rising star, particularly after his much-respected time as mayor of Newark, New Jersey. Former Governor of Massachusetts Deval Patrick has been brought up, and even though he says he’s not interested, that was over a year ago, and he may change his mind.

No matter who Clinton picks, she’s got a solid list from which to choose. As the Republican Party contenders spend the next few months tearing each other down, she’s got time to groom a running mate and solidify her base.

Anneliese Mahoney
Anneliese Mahoney is Managing Editor at Law Street and a Connecticut transplant to Washington D.C. She has a Bachelor’s degree in International Affairs from the George Washington University, and a passion for law, politics, and social issues. Contact Anneliese at amahoney@LawStreetMedia.com.

The post Hillary’s In, But Who Will She Run With? appeared first on Law Street.

]]>
https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/elections/hillarys-will-run/feed/ 1 37740