A woman named Titi Pierce from Warner Robins, Georgia, is suing Warner Brothers over a segment Ellen DeGeneres did on her popular daytime talkshow. Pierce is a Robins Air Force Base engineer and a real-estate agent. On her February 22 show, DeGeneres showed footage of one of Pierce’s real estate signs and mispronounced her name as “titty Pierce.” As a result of the mocking, Pierce has allegedly received threats and harassment, and filed a lawsuit in District Court on Thursday.

Pierce’s name is actually pronounced “tee-tee” and is originally a Nigerian name meaning “flower.” However, DeGeneres made a series of breast-related jokes about Pierce’s name in a segment about funny signs. DeGeneres also contrasted Pierce’s real estate sign with another sign advertising the “Nipple Convalescent Home,” stating: Titty Pierce, sounds like she might have spent some time in that nipple home, I don’t know.”

The segment was broadcast in February, and then shown again on a rerun in April. It was also posted to the show’s Facebook page.

Pierce’s lawsuit claims that DeGeneres’s show showed her phone number when the sign was displayed (although it was blurred out on the version that was posted to Facebook.) As a result of the show, Pierce claims to have received a number of harassing and mocking phone calls. In response her office posted on Facebook:

Loving that our own Titi Pierce of CBRF (Coldwell Banker Robbins & Free) was on the Ellen DeGeneres show, but wish it was because they knew how fabulous and classy Titi is and not to poke fun. We love you Titi and are proud to have you in the CBRF Family.

Pierce’s lawsuit alleges that DeGeneres “defamed her, invaded her privacy and intentionally inflicted distress.” Pierce is asking for damages, and is aiming to keep the segment from airing again.

Check out the clip in question below (although note that the number has been now blurred out):

Anneliese Mahoney

Anneliese Mahoney is Managing Editor at Law Street and a Connecticut transplant to Washington D.C. She has a Bachelor’s degree in International Affairs from the George Washington University, and a passion for law, politics, and social issues. Contact Anneliese at amahoney@LawStreetMedia.com.

The post Warner Brothers Sued After Ellen DeGeneres Mocks Woman’s Name appeared first on Law Street.

Fun fact: the well-known horror flick “The Conjuring” is based on supposed events that happened in a real house, located in the small village of Harrisville, Rhode Island. The 2013 movie was a huge success for Warner Bros., but not so much for the two people that actually live in the home. Residents Norma Sutcliffe and Gerry Helfrich are being driven crazy by fans who come to the house to look for evidence of the supernatural. It’s gotten so bad that Sutcliffe and Helfrich are now suing Warner Bros, the film’s director, and others for their troubles.

“The Conjuring” is based on the story of a couple of ghost hunters, Ed and Lorraine Warren. They’re a pretty famous pair in the ghost hunting community–“A Haunting in Connecticut” and “The Amityville Horror” were also based on their investigations. They were brought to the Harrisville, Rhode Island by the family who lived there in the 1970s, the Perrons. The Perrons and their five daughters were supposedly haunted by the ghosts of various spirits, and hired the Warrens to help them rid their house of supernatural occurrences. The farmhouse, built in the 18th century, had quite a history of death and misfortune.

Whether or not this story is true is very hotly debated–the Perron family and Lorraine Warren swear it is,  but there are many skeptics. Regardless, the story had all the important elements of the perfect horror movie–an old New England farm house, a young family, and even a haunted doll named Annabelle. So, it was obviously a huge box office hit; the movie generated almost $60 million in its first weekend alone.

The actual house wasn’t used in the filming, but the movie’s opening credits disclose that the events took place at an old farmhouse in Harrisville. Given the lore about the Perrons that already existed before the movie, it’s not hard to figure out that the house is the one that Sutcliffe and Helfrich live in now. But Sutcliffe claims that she had no idea that Warner Bros was even planning on making the movie until a friend told her about it–and since it’s come out, things have gotten crazy for them. Sutcliffe stated:

The Internet was bombarded by people who were actually going around the property, filming. … We had harassing phone calls in the middle of the night. They’ve had discussions of people destroying the house because ‘it’s so full of evil.’

She said that they’ve posted “No Trespassing” signs and built fences, but nothing has kept crazed fans at bay. Sutcliffe claims they’ve been harassed, stalked, and that she’s had to call the police at every hour to keep people away from her home. Now, they’re suing Warner Bros and others involved in the movie, for monetary damages, although according to some sources, they plan on asking that any money they receive be donated to local law enforcement for their trouble. They also want help with a security system and security plan to keep the crazies away.

It’s hard not to feel some sympathy for Sutcliffe and Helfrich–they’re now being haunted themselves by crazed fans instead of ghosts and possessed dolls. We’ll see if they’re successful in this lawsuit and rid themselves of their very-much human demons.

Anneliese Mahoney

Anneliese Mahoney is Managing Editor at Law Street and a Connecticut transplant to Washington D.C. She has a Bachelor’s degree in International Affairs from the George Washington University, and a passion for law, politics, and social issues. Contact Anneliese at amahoney@LawStreetMedia.com.

The post Couple who Lives in “The Conjuring” House Sues Warner Bros. appeared first on Law Street.

We live in a world where fan communities–fandoms–are becoming increasingly popular. Fandoms fixate on a particular television show, band, movie, musical, anime, or other pop culture subject. Creation of content based on these fandoms has also become ubiquitous. People of all ages gather together on any number of fanfiction websites, ranging from social media sites that post stories and art, like Tumblr and Live Journal, to websites designed for fanfiction, like Fanfiction.net and Archive of Our Own. Some fandoms have even developed websites devoted entirely to fanfiction for a particular couple or desired couple, known to many as a “ship.”

When using characters and worlds created by other people, however, there are quite a few potential copyright issues. Fan creations have become so popular that some fandoms are even branching out and making money from their fanfiction and fan art roots. Yet getting the “rights” to your own work is a nightmare when you’ve used a couple from your favorite television show. Though some fandoms have successfully made the switch from unoriginal characters to new creations, many struggle with it.

Fanfiction and fan art are always going to be a part of fandom communities because they bring people together in a way so few things really can. These fandoms have created large communities all over the internet. “Harry Potter,” for instance, is still hugely popular in the fanfiction world, even though J. K. Rowling and Warner Brothers have successfully fought against fan creations.

What exactly are your rights when you take to your computer and write or draw that missing scene from “Once Upon a Time?”

The Official Word

According to a University of San Francisco law blog, fanfiction “can be considered a copyright violation under the Copyright Act of 1976, ” because the holder of the copyright has the right to distribute any derivative works based on an original creation. This often includes sequels, prequels, and art work.

One of the most famous cases of a fan-fiction author is that of J. D. California who penned a sequel to J. D. Salinger’s “Catcher in the Rye” and called it “60 Years Later: Coming through the Rye.” During this case, it was found that characters were granted copyright protection–in this case, Holden Caulfield, an iconic character in Salinger’s novel.

Many would argue that fair use may actually protect fan creations like artwork and stories from being copyright infringement, but many authors have still successfully fought that claim. Legal challenges tend to come more from book authors than movie or television show creators for pretty pragmatic reasons–fandoms often boost the number of viewers for television shows.

So why are so many publishers now actively looking for fan-fiction authors? In part because these stories are sometimes better or more successful than the canonical source material. One cannot ignore the success of recent fanfiction-based novels like “50 Shades of Grey.” Rebecca E. Hoffman for Bloomberg describes how “50 Shades” got around the fan-fiction ties:

But before they became ‘real’ books, they were a Twilight fan fiction series called ‘Master of the Universe.’ ‘MotU’ appeared on fanfiction.net and–with Twilight references removed and character names changed–was later published as three e-books by an Australian company that specializes in fan fiction publishing. Vintage Books, a subdivision of Random House, which ultimately published the Fifty Shades trilogy, maintains that the material is original and no longer based on ‘Twilight.’

According to a Washington Post interview with Jennifer Bersgtrom, Vice President and Publisher of Gallery Books, fanfiction is simply becoming a way to recruit talented authors. She stated, “fanfiction has absolutely become part of the fiber of what we publish. This is changing at a time when traditional publishing needs it most.”

Most fanfiction is safe if it doesn’t criticize or parody the works in question. Even so, the Internet and Intellectual Policy Clinic at the University of San Francisco points out that the only way a person would get in trouble is if the person who holds the copyright ever sees the work:

It is clear though that the law surrounding fanfiction is highly dependent on the copyright owner actually enforcing their rights and prosecuting offenders of their copyright. In cases such as J.K. Rowling in which she is choosing particular pieces of work to prosecute while letting other works that violate her copyright be published, the law clearly sides with her.

The Legal Dos and Don’ts of Fanfiction

The Don’ts

The biggest rule you need to know to avoid getting into copyright hot water is to determine who exactly owns what you are writing about. Some authors simply do not like fanfiction and are very open about that fact. Vulture says that “some authors–George R.R. Martin, Anne Rice, and Diana Gabaldon, author of the Outlander series, among them–protest [fanfiction’s] appropriation of their creations and ask fans to refrain from writing it.” They mostly target websites based on the stories, but have targeted large forums as well.

Some fanfiction creators also have some problems in that they don’t know where to draw the line. Typically there are concerns about RPF or Real Person Fanfiction. Celebrities like Chris Colfer of “Glee” and Taylor Swift have said that they find fanfiction and fan art uncomfortable, especially when it is explicit in nature. Swift has even gone so far as to get fan creations taken off of Etsy, though that may be more of a business decision.

Read More: Taylor Swift vs. Etsy Vendors: Singer Trademarks Song Phrases

It isn’t always easy, however, as every writer, designer, and artist has the right to make the choice for themselves where they want the line drawn and whether or not to take legal action. It is then up to the forum and fandom at large to enforce that line as they see fit, an important thing to remember when dealing with fanfiction and fan art.

Nonetheless, as Hugh Howey told Desert News National: “Just as there have been independent filmmakers [who] enrich the film industry, there are and will be independent authors who experiment and write groundbreaking works.”

The Dos

If you truly love a fictional couple, a storyline, or a show, you might still want to write fanfiction or create fan art, and there is truly nothing wrong with that. However, you should take note of a few rules to keep yourself out of the limelight and out of trouble.

1. Follow the rules of the online forum: Most forums that post fanfiction and/or fanart have been around for a long time for a reason: they know how to skirt the line. Look at the rules and FAQs of a website before you upload your latest “Shameless” story.
2. When in doubt, go for public domain: The Daily Beast points out that there is a lot of Jane Austen fanfiction. Why? Her works are all part of the public domain, meaning you can use the characters however you see fit. According to Teaching Copyright, public domain occurs “70 years after the death of author, or, for corporate works, anonymous works, or works for hire, 95 years from the date of publication or 120 years from the date of creation, whichever expires first.” If you are using something a little more modern, use a disclaimer, meaning make sure that you state clearly that you don’t “own” whatever you are writing about.
3. Take it down if you need to: Online musical theater troupe Team StarKid famously took down A Very Potter Musical when they feared that Warner Brothers would sue them. They re-posted the material after some severe edits and a disclaimer on the video–and then went on to make two more and were invited to the screening of the final movie. Most creators or agents will start with a mailing or a polite request, and you should probably grant it.

4. Don’t make money from it: This might seem like a no-brainer, but do not make money from your work if it’s based on someone else’s creations. Don’t sell your art or stories, do not get sponsors, and don’t use advertisements. You are saving yourself a load of potential headaches from the people who own the content.

Conclusion

In the end, the best thing to remember about fanfiction, fan art, and anything derived in any other universe is this: it is typically an infringement of the copyright holder. With that said, it is usually done with the best of intentions by fans and it often continues and strengthens the importance of the story being told.

When creating within a fandom, use your head to make decisions about what is appropriate and what isn’t appropriate and you likely won’t find yourself in trouble. It’s also important to note that if you are creative enough to take pre-existing characters and create new stories, you are probably creative enough to make your own original characters.

Resources

Primary

U.S. Copyright Office: Duration of Copyright

Additional

Bloomberg BNA: It’s Never Black or White: Is Fanfiction Fair Use?

Desert News National: With Fanfiction, is Publishing Following in Hollywood’s Unoriginal Footsteps?

Teaching Copyright:  Public Domain Frequently Asked Questions

Washington Post: From ‘Fifty Shades’ to ‘After’: Why publishers Want Fanfiction to Go Mainstream

University of San Francisco Law Blog: Fanfiction and Copyright Law

Vulture: Fanfiction Guide

CNN: Lawsuit Targets ‘Rip-Off’ of ‘Catcher in the Rye’

Daily Beast: Why Fanfiction is the Future of Publishing

Geeky News: Unauthorized Starkid Production Brings Wrath

The New York Times: Rowling Wins Lawsuit Against Potter Lexicon

Fox News: How Harry Potter Superfans Won a Battle for Fair-trade Chocolate

People: Fifty Shades of Grey and Nine More Examples of When Fanfiction Became Blockbusters

USA Today: Must-Read Fanfiction From ‘Doctor Who,’ ‘Star Trek,’ ‘Farscape’

Noel Diem

Law Street contributor Noel Diem is an editor and aspiring author based in Reading, Pennsylvania. She is an alum of Albright College where she studied English and Secondary Education. In her spare time she enjoys traveling, theater, fashion, and literature. Contact Noel at staff@LawStreetMedia.com.

The post Re-Writing the Classics: What Are Your Fanfiction Rights? appeared first on Law Street.