Orrin Hatch – Law Street https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com Law and Policy for Our Generation Wed, 13 Nov 2019 21:46:22 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.8 100397344 RantCrush Top 5: May 19, 2017 https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/rantcrush/rantcrush-top-5-may-19-2017/ https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/rantcrush/rantcrush-top-5-may-19-2017/#respond Fri, 19 May 2017 16:52:33 +0000 https://lawstreetmedia.com/?p=60857

Happy Friday!

The post RantCrush Top 5: May 19, 2017 appeared first on Law Street.

]]>
Image courtesy of Don LaVange; License: (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Welcome to RantCrush Top 5, where we take you through today’s top five controversial stories in the world of law and policy. Who’s ranting and raving right now? Check it out below:

Around the World with Donald Trump

Today, President Donald Trump sets off for a foreign trip. Given recent hits to the credibility of his leadership–most notably his firing of James Comey and allegations that he leaked sensitive information to Russian diplomats–this trip is considered “do or die” by many.

Trump will visit Saudi Arabia and Israel as well as attend global summits in Italy and Belgium. The whole world is watching to see if he manages to slip up or offend any other world leaders on his tour. But according to some reports, Trump doesn’t actually want to go on the trip. Information has also been leaked indicating that preparing Trump for high-pressure situations is harder than it should be. According to the New York Times: “In an attempt to capture his interest, aides threaded Mr. Trump’s own name through the paragraphs of one of the two-page memos they wrote for him.” All eyes will be on Trump during his trip–we’ll have to see how this goes.

via GIPHY

Anneliese Mahoney
Anneliese Mahoney is Managing Editor at Law Street and a Connecticut transplant to Washington D.C. She has a Bachelor’s degree in International Affairs from the George Washington University, and a passion for law, politics, and social issues. Contact Anneliese at amahoney@LawStreetMedia.com.

The post RantCrush Top 5: May 19, 2017 appeared first on Law Street.

]]>
https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/rantcrush/rantcrush-top-5-may-19-2017/feed/ 0 60857
Americans Tell the Senate: #DoYourJob https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/law/americans-tell-the-senate-doyourjob/ https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/law/americans-tell-the-senate-doyourjob/#respond Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:13:59 +0000 http://lawstreetmedia.com/?p=51308

They should be considering Merrick Garland.

The post Americans Tell the Senate: #DoYourJob appeared first on Law Street.

]]>
"Mitch McConnell" courtesy of [Gage Skidmore via Flickr]

Yesterday, President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court to fill the vacancy left by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. Since Scalia’s death, Senate Republicans have been vowing that they will not hold hearings on whoever Obama nominates, because he’s in the last year of his office. But with Garland as his choice, Obama is essentially calling their bluff–Garland is by most accounts a moderate, and has received Republican support in the past. So, will the Senate Republicans continue to block Garland? Or will they “do their job?”

The news that Obama had chosen Garland as his nominee led to predictably mixed reactions around Washington. As expected, Republican leaders, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senator Chuck Grassley, who chairs the Senate judiciary committee, both stuck to their lines that a new justice shouldn’t be chosen until the next President is in office.

A few Senate Republicans did acknowledge that the Senators should at least meet with Garland and vet him–Senator Susan Collins of Maine said:

I believe that we should follow the regular order in considering this nominee. The Constitution’s very clear that the president has every right to make this nomination, and then the Senate can either consent or withhold its consent.

A few other Republicans, including Senator Jeff Flake, admitted that they would consider nominating Garland in a lame duck session if Hillary Clinton (or another Democrat) is elected in November.

As expected, most Democrats responded to the Republican blockade with frustration. The senior-most Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator Patrick Leahy stated:

There is more than enough time for senators to publicly and thoroughly examine Chief Judge Garland’s qualifications and vote on his confirmation before Memorial Day. For more than 40 years, the Senate has held a confirmation vote on Supreme Court nominees on average 70 days after their formal nomination. The Senate should afford Chief Judge Garland the same process with a fair and public hearing in April, and the full Senate should vote on his confirmation by May 25.

Many politicians, pundits, and celebrities also took to Twitter with the hashtag #DoYourJob, encouraging the Senate Judiciary to consider Garland.

Despite the fact that Senate Republicans are claiming that they refuse to hold hearings on a SCOTUS nominee to “give Americans a voice,” Americans don’t exactly seem to agree. A poll conducted earlier this month found that 66 percent of respondents think that the Senate should at least hold hearings and vote on a nominee. Additionally, 55 percent disagreed with the Senate’s decision to “not consider” a nominee offered by Obama. At this point, Senate Republicans probably won’t end up considering Garland, but as a result, they may have to pay for it in the polls. 

Anneliese Mahoney
Anneliese Mahoney is Managing Editor at Law Street and a Connecticut transplant to Washington D.C. She has a Bachelor’s degree in International Affairs from the George Washington University, and a passion for law, politics, and social issues. Contact Anneliese at amahoney@LawStreetMedia.com.

The post Americans Tell the Senate: #DoYourJob appeared first on Law Street.

]]>
https://legacy.lawstreetmedia.com/blogs/law/americans-tell-the-senate-doyourjob/feed/ 0 51308