McDonald’s has never really been known for treating its employees well, per se. That being said, I’m not sure many of us realized quite how bad it is at some of the roughly 15,000 McDonald’s locations nationwide until this week when news broke that workers in 19 different states filed complaints with the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

These complaints allege dangerous working conditions, lack of training, and hazardous equipment, among other faults. A particularly common complaint appears to be that workers are often burned by the equipment they have to handle on the job. Workers cited not having gloves when they are required to handle hot equipment, or that they’ve had to clean hot grills that haven’t been turned off.

A particularly disturbing story was told by one Chicago McDonald’s worker, Brittney Berry. She claims that she slipped and burnt her arm on a grill to the extent that the burn caused nerve damage. What’s even more worrisome is that she reports that her managers responded to the incident by telling her to put mustard on her arms, of all things. She stated:

My managers kept pushing me to work faster. The managers told me to put mustard on it, but I ended up having to get rushed to the hospital in an ambulance. This is exactly why workers at McDonald’s need union rights.

While this sounds shocking and horrible, it’s evidently not that unheard of. Polling group Hart Research Associates conducted a survey last year of nearly 1,500 adult fast food workers about their injuries on the job. Almost 80 percent reported suffering from burns, and Berry’s manager apparently wasn’t too unique, because a third of those who suffered burns reported having a member of management tell them to put some sort of condiment–like mustard, mayo, butter, or ketchup–on it to treat the problem. In addition, the survey found that two-thirds of those workers had been cut by something on the job, 33 percent had been hurt while carrying some sort of heavy item, and 23 percent had fallen on a slippery surface. Overall, nearly 90 percent of the fast food workers surveyed had been hurt in some way. While that survey didn’t just focus on McDonald’s workers, but rather on the industry as a whole, it’s hard to imagine that the conditions at McDonald’s are significant outliers from its peer companies.

These complaints fit into a ongoing campaign for workers’ rights being waged against McDonald’s by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and other groups. Called the “Fight for $15” campaign, it aims to up the minimum wage for McDonald’s workers as well as provide them with safer working conditions.

McDonald’s has of course responded to the allegations levied against it, bringing up the “Fight for $15” campaign in a rather dismissive way:

McDonald’s and its independent franchisees are committed to providing safe working conditions for employees in the 14,000 McDonald’s Brand U.S. restaurants. We will review these allegations. It is important to note that these complaints are part of a larger strategy orchestrated by activists targeting our brand and designed to generate media coverage.

OSHA has confirmed that the allegations are being looked into, so whether they are actually true will be decided by the government. Either way, it creates a pretty grim picture of the working conditions at these branches, and a rather convincing argument for reform.

Anneliese Mahoney

Anneliese Mahoney is Managing Editor at Law Street and a Connecticut transplant to Washington D.C. She has a Bachelor’s degree in International Affairs from the George Washington University, and a passion for law, politics, and social issues. Contact Anneliese at amahoney@LawStreetMedia.com.

The post Do You Want Pain With Your Fries? OSHA Investigating McDonald’s appeared first on Law Street.

In June, Seattle made the news when the city announced that it would be upping its minimum wage to $15 per hour. In a time when arguments over the minimum wage has led to various strikes, discussions, and political debates, the Seattle move was unprecedented. It was pretty smooth too–the Seattle mayor was able to negotiate between a lot of different parties in order to create such a high minimum wage without much resistance. But now the change has finally hit a road bump–attorney Paul Clement is suing the city of Seattle for the minimum wage hike.

The lawsuit, filed by Clement, is on behalf of an organization called the International Franchise Organization. This move has received support from several major organizations, including the United States Chamber of Commerce and National Restaurant Organization, both of which recently joined the lawsuit.

The problem that these groups have with the new minimum wage law stems from the way in which it distinguishes between national chains, franchises, and small businesses. The current text of the law will require large corporations with chains in Seattle to adopt the $15 minimum wage within the next three years. Small businesses have up to seven years to implement it. Franchisees–small businesses that are affiliated with but not operated by larger chains, must implement it within three years. Examples of franchises include Pizza Hut, Dunkin Donuts, and Subway.

The Mayor of Seattle, Ed Murray claims that franchises have support that small mom-and-pop businesses don’t–namely in the form of advertisements, supplies, and menu creation.

The lawyer filing the suit on behalf of the franchisees, Paul Clement,  has had a lot of success with arguing cases in front of the Supreme Court. He has argued 74 cases in front of the highest court in the land, including two of the most talked-about cases of this year–Clement was involved in both the Hobby Lobby and Aereo cases. Clement was also involved in cases related to the Affordable Care Act, and argued on behalf of the Defense of Marriage Act.

He explained why he felt so strongly about the rights of franchisees to receive more time to implement the minimum wage:

I think that that points to the issue that’s at the heart of this case: corporate separateness. When you walk into a McDonald’s or Days Inn or coffee shop that has a dozen outlets, you’re not walking into corporate headquarters. These franchised companies are organized differently from a company that’s one monolithic company with one set of management and one set of employees.

Clement also claims that this is a direct attack on the franchise model of business–mostly coordinated by unions.

This suit marks an interesting turn in a large nation-wide debate about minimum wages. The argument isn’t being made that the wage hike shouldn’t happen, but rather that it’s being pushed on too quick of a time-table. That’s a good sign for minimum wage increases, and indicates that the organizations currently challenging the law realize that. Although $15 is a lot more than what most places are proposing, the idea of a minimum wage hike in general appears to be widely supported. As of a poll about 10 months ago, roughly 75 percent of American support raising the federal minimum wage to $9 per hour. Whichever way the Seattle fight goes, hopefully the minimum wage will soon take a big jump.

Anneliese Mahoney

Anneliese Mahoney is Managing Editor at Law Street and a Connecticut transplant to Washington D.C. She has a Bachelor’s degree in International Affairs from the George Washington University, and a passion for law, politics, and social issues. Contact Anneliese at amahoney@LawStreetMedia.com.

The post Seattle Minimum Wage Battle Heading to Court appeared first on Law Street.